My view about the Moderators here

[Andyman]

They all sound like DA's POV. Scary! [img]wink.gif[/img]

[Dajistano]

This is a great thread. [img]biggrin.gif[/img]

[Darkest Angel]

Okay, let's do it. Let's give our young people the values that will inspire them to dispense justice. Before I say anything else, let me remind Miss Fluffy D. Andyman, Esq. that her most cantankerous tactic is to fabricate a phony war between churlish, slovenly New Age beatniks and hateful, callow purveyors of malice and hatred. This way, Fluffy can subjugate both groups into helping her hinder economic growth and job creation. I honestly don't want that to happen, which is why I'm telling you that Fluffy pompously claims that black is white and night is day. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. Her perceptions manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: inflict more death and destruction than Genghis Khan's hordes. Phase two: base racial definitions on lineage, phrenological characteristics, skin hue, and religion.

I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, people tell me that statistical details released by a third-party agency indicate that the idea of letting Fluffy promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush is, in itself, incomprehensible. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. She claims that it is vexatious to question her pranks. Sound suspicious? Quixotic is a better word.

In a broad-brush sense, most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions. It may seem to many people, maybe even the majority, that Fluffy's stances amount to what a proverbial metaphor in Sanskrit describes as trying to extinguish a fire by feeding it enough wood to glut its appetite. But you knew that already. So let me add that we must shape a world of dignity and harmony, a world of justice, solidarity, liberty, and prosperity in such as way that there is nothing Fluffy can do about it except learn to live with the fait accompli. Whatever weight we accord to that fact, we may be confident that Fluffy maintains that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially her vulgar form of it -- is. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that I, not being one of the many distasteful, pertinacious weasels of this world, would like to comment on Fluffy's attempt to associate autism with plagiarism. There is no association. Fluffy expresses a fatuitous nostalgia for a uniform, unchallenging, homogeneous society that never really existed. That is to say, Fluffy is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside herself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of her wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees. In short, Miss Fluffy D. Andyman, Esq.'s ideologies are so nebulous and malleable that they can be used to justify any impolitic circulars.

[Andyman]

Admit it DA. You didn't run that through the complaint generator, did you? You wrote that yourself! [img]wink.gif[/img]

[Darkest Angel]

[img]redface.gif[/img]

[Andyman]

LOL!

All too often, some people attempt to make an argument by attacking and insulting those who hold opposing views. Dark Angel's rodomontades are a perfect example. Let's get down to brass tacks: Scummy scum serve as the priests in Dark Angel's cult of prolix, ornery extremism. These "priests" spend their days basking in Dark Angel's reflected glory, pausing only when Dark Angel instructs them to give expression to that which is most destructive and most harmful to society. What could be more noxious? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: He fervently believes that the boogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to his demands. This shows that he is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that Dark Angel would have us believe that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Dark Angel is surrounded by mean-spirited doomsday prophets who parrot the same nonsense, which is why if you've never seen him call evil good and good evil, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. Every so often, you'll see Dark Angel lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for seeking to grant batty dweebs the keys to the kingdom, and vow never again to be so pestilential. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that he is not just stupid. He is unbelievably, astronomically stupid. If you've ever watched television or read a book, odds are that you already know that teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that Dark Angel can absorb mana by devouring his nemeses' brains. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that it is not uncommon for Dark Angel to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole lousy affair as some great benefit to humanity. Anyway, I hope I've made my point, which is that Dark Angel can out-reason frowzy muttonheads but not anyone else.

[Darkest Angel]

...that's bullshit! I have never apologized! *Boogeyman gets Fluffy....DA cracks open his skull and eats his brain...bats take over Unreal board* [img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img]

[Drau]

It's scarry how it generates complaints about DA, especially when you include the title of "Lord" [img]eek.gif[/img]

[Darkest Angel]

...post! [img]smile.gif[/img]

[Darkest Angel]

...who wnats a new signature line?

He is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul. I hate Dark Angel to my very bone marrow. I don't think anyone questions that.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">